[1]陈智.对我国公司注册资本“零首付”问题的分析[J].镇江高专学报,2015,(03):73-76.
 CHEN Zhi.Analysis of the problems of “zero down payment” registered capital for company establishment[J].,2015,(03):73-76.
点击复制

对我国公司注册资本“零首付”问题的分析()
分享到:

《镇江高专学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2015年03期
页码:
73-76
栏目:
政治与法律论坛
出版日期:
2015-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the problems of “zero down payment” registered capital for company establishment
文章编号:
1008-8148(2015)03-0073-04
作者:
陈智
扬州大学 法学院,江苏 扬州225009
Author(s):
CHEN Zhi
School of Law, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
关键词:
注册资本实缴登记制认缴登记制法定资本制
Keywords:
registered capital actually paid registration system subscribed registration system the legal capital system
分类号:
D922.291.91
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2014年3月1日开始施行的《中华人民共和国公司法》中最大的变革就是注册公司由实缴登记制变成认缴登记制,即成立公司可以“零首付”。但是,在我国当前的社会环境中推行注册资本认缴登记制仍存在许多问题,如实行认缴登记制与《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法若干问题的规定(三)〉》中第10条和《中华人民共和国刑法》第158,159条相冲突,实行认缴登记制会给公司带来经营成本的增加、容易成为股东谋取私利的工具、增加公司法人人格否认制度的适用等问题。只有这些问题得到有效化解,公司注册资本认缴登记制才能真正发挥积极作用。
Abstract:
The biggest change in “the Peoples Republic of China Company Law” implemented on March 1, 2014 is from the paid registration system to the subscribed registration system, namely, “zero down payment” for the establishment of companies. But in Chinas current social environments, implementation of the subscribed registration system of registered capital still brings about many problems, such as the conflict between the implementation of a subscribed registration system and the Article10 in the Supreme Provisions to the Peoples Court on Several Issues concerning the Company Law of the peoples Republic of China and the Article 158, 159 in the Criminal Law of the Peoples Republic of China. This also increases the operating costs for the company and makes it easy to become the tool for the shareholders to seek personal gains and increases the companys disregard of the system and so on. The company registered capital subscribed registration system can really play a positive role only after these problems are effectively resolved.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吕来明,杨明敏.论我国公司资本制度的改革及债权人利益的保护[J].法律适用,2013(12):28-29.

[2] 愈智渊.注册资本“零首付”后果[J].董事会,2014(1):80-81.

[3] 法律出版社法规中心.公司法及司法解释汇编[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:2.

[4] 王志祥,韩雪.论与公司资本制度有关的犯罪圈的重构:以公司资本制度的重大调整为视角[J].法治研究,2014(1):42-43.

[5] 蒋安杰.公司法资本制度改革的解读与思考:专访中国政法大学教授、中国商法学研究会常务副会长赵旭东[J].法制资讯,2014(3):28-32.

[6] 刘远景.公司法教程[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008:54-55.


[7] 朱慈蕴.公司法人格否认法理研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1998:68-69.

[8] 理查德·A·波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997:3.

[9] Phillip I B. The law of corporate groups:substantive law[M].Boston :Little Brown, 1987:34-35.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期: 2015-05-07

作者简介: 陈智(1989—),女,江苏徐州人,硕士生,主要从事民商法研究。

更新日期/Last Update: 2015-07-13