[1]李佳臻.正当法律程序之浅析[J].镇江高专学报,2017,(01):64-67.
 LI Jiazhen.Analysis of due process of law[J].,2017,(01):64-67.
点击复制

正当法律程序之浅析()
分享到:

《镇江高专学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
64-67
栏目:
政治与法律论坛
出版日期:
2017-01-12

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of due process of law
文章编号:
1008-8148(2017)01-0064-04
作者:
李佳臻
烟台大学 法学院,山东 烟台264000
Author(s):
LI Jiazhen
School of Law, Yantai University, Yantai 264000, China
关键词:
自然正义正当法律程序实质性正当法律程序公民权利
Keywords:
natural justice due process of law substantive due process of law rights of citizen
分类号:
D90
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
正当法律程序作为英美法系国家法治建设中的一项重要原则,其核心价值在于对公权力行为进行检验,以实现对个人权利的保障。正当法律程序开始于英国,具有浓厚的普通法传统,美国在继受该程序后,在宪政实践中把正当法律程序从程序性正当法律程序发展至实质性正当法律程序的层面。分析正当法律程序的起源,介绍正当法律程序在美国的产生和适用,着重分析实质性正当法律程序,论述正当法律程序对我国宪政发展的启示。
Abstract:
Due process of law is an important principle in the common law countries under the rule of law construction such as in America and Great Britain. Its core value lies in checking out public power behavior in order to realize the protection of individual rights. Due process of law, which began in the UK, has a tradition of the common law. The United States follows the program and makes the due process of law develop from procedural due process of law to the level of substantive due process of law. The article analyzes the origin of the due process of law first, introduces the generation and application of due process of law in the United States, mainly analyzes the substantive due process of law, and finally discusses the instructions of the due process of law to our countrys constitutional development.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张彩凤.一个民族的图腾: 美国宪法导读[M]//朱曾汶,译,美国宪法及其修正案.北京:商务印书馆,2014:57-58.

[2] 朱曾汶.美国宪法及其修正案[M].北京:商务印书馆,2014.

[3] 刘小冰.美国宪法的综合分析[M]//朱曾汶,译,美国宪法及其修正案.北京:商务印书馆,2014:35.

[4] 张千帆.美国联邦宪法[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.

[5] 马玉丽.论美国联邦最高法院对正当程序的阐释:以自然法为视角[J].时代法学,2015,13(1): 112-118.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期: 2016-08-18

作者简介: 李佳臻(1992—),女,山东临沂人,硕士生,主要从事刑事诉讼法研究。

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-01-11