[1]连小刚,庞艳霞.邵亢相关问题考述[J].镇江高专学报,2017,(03):6-9.
 LIAN Xiaogang,PANG Yanxia. A historical examination on Shao Kangs relevant issues[J].,2017,(03):6-9.
点击复制

邵亢相关问题考述(/HTML)
分享到:

《镇江高专学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
6-9
栏目:
京口文化研究
出版日期:
2017-06-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A historical examination on Shao Kangs relevant issues
文章编号:
1008-8148(2017)03-0006-04
作者:
连小刚1庞艳霞2
1. 镇江博物馆 保管部,江苏 镇江212002;2. 宜城市第三高级中学,湖北 宜城441400
Author(s):
 LIAN Xiaogang1 PANG Yanxia2
 1. Storage Department, Zhenjiang Museum, Zhenjiang 212002,China;2. The 3rd Senior Middle School of Yicheng City,Yicheng 441400,China
关键词:
北宋邵亢科举入仕
Keywords:
 Key words:the Northern Song Dynasty Shao Kang political career through imperial examination
分类号:
K825.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
邵亢是北宋丹阳邵氏家族的代表人物。他曾数次科举不第,后以制科入仕。根据其应考的情况观察,他应分别参加过学士院试与秘阁试。邵亢文学出众,交友广泛。考察其交友情况,可判断其反对变法的政治态度。史籍中对邵亢的评价多为正面,其被参知政事吴奎弹劾一事亦情有可原。
Abstract:
 Abstract:Shao Kang was a representative figure of Shaos family in Danyang of the Northern Song Dynasty. After having failed in the imperial examinations several times, he entered the official career through Zhike. According to the results of his exams, he took the courtyard and the secret court trial respectively. In literature, Shao Kang was talented and cultured with a wide circle of friends. Investigating his social activities, we can judge that Shao Kang was opposed to political reform. More of the evaluation of Shao Kang in the history books was positive. And Shao Kang could be forgiven for thinking that he was impeached by assistant administrator Wu Kui.

参考文献/References:

[1] 蔑里乞·脱脱,阿尔拉·阿鲁图.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[2] 严其林.镇江进士研究[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2014:393-394.
[3] 王珪.华阳集:卷37[M]//故宫博物院.钦定武英殿聚珍版丛书(第36册).北京:故宫出版社,2012.
[4] 王应麟.困学纪闻:卷15[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:1697.
[5] 徐松.宋会要辑稿:第9册[M].刘琳,刁忠民,舒大刚,等,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.
[6] 徐松.宋会要辑稿:第10册[M].刘琳,刁忠民,舒大刚,等,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.
[7] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[8] 龚延明.宋代及第进士之鉴别[G]//刘海峰.二十世纪科举研究论文选编.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009:579.
[9] 傅璇琮,龚延明,祖慧.宋登科记考[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2009:1932.
[10] 聂崇岐.宋代制举考略[G]//聂崇岐.宋史丛考.北京:中华书局,1980:180.
[11] 丁守和.中国历代奏议大典(辽宋金元卷)[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨出版社,1994:193.
[12] 梁廷楠.东坡事类:卷1[M]. 汤开建,陈文源,点校.广州:暨南大学出版社,1992:15.
[13] 王丽.“文德治世”:宋代献文召试制度考述[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2014(2):96-104.
[14] 王应麟.玉海:第1册[M].台北:中文出版社,1977:549.
[15] 叶梦得.石林燕语[M].侯忠义,点校.北京:中华书局,1984:99.
[16] 徐松.宋会要辑稿:第7册[M].刘琳,刁忠民,舒大刚,等,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:4046.[17] 李之亮.北宋京师及东西路大郡守臣考[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2001:197.
[18] 曾枣庄,刘琳.全宋文:第48册:卷1033[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2006.
[19] 北京大学古文献研究室.全宋诗:第七册:卷399[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992:4898-4899.
[20] 曾枣庄,李文泽,吴洪泽.中国文学家大辞典:宋代卷[M].北京:中华书局,2004:520.
[21] 梁披云.中国书法大辞典[M].广州:广东人民出版社,1984:514.
[22] 李之亮,徐正英.安阳集编年笺注:卷四[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2000:145.
[23] 李之亮.司马温公集编年笺注:第1册[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2008.
[24] 吴处厚.青箱杂记[M]. 李裕民,点校.北京:中华书局,1985:20-21.
[25] 陈光崇.第一部《南唐书》的作者胡恢其人[J].史学史研究,1986(3):15-19.
[26] 曾枣庄,刘琳.全宋文:第74册:卷1624[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2006:291.
[27] 李之亮.王荆公文集笺注:中册:卷19[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2005:740-741.
[28] 佚名.宋史全文:上册[M].李之亮,点校.哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2005:553.
[29] 邵伯温.邵氏闻见录:卷3[M].李剑雄,刘德权,点校.北京:中华书局,1983:24.
[30] 曾枣庄,刘琳.全宋文:第101册:卷2211[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2006:272.
[31] 王称.东都事略[M].孙言诚,崔国光,点校.济南:齐鲁书社,2000.
[32] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编拾补[M].黄以周,辑注.顾吉辰,点校.北京:中华书局,2004.

相似文献/References:

[1]史上玉.北宋乐律考订与古代士大夫的雅乐情结[J].镇江高专学报,2017,(03):108.
 SHI Shangyu. Textual criticism of Gagaku in the Northern Song Dynasty and scholarbureaucrats pursuit of Gagaku[J].,2017,(03):108.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期: 2017-01-18
作者简介: 连小刚(1977—),男,馆员,硕士,主要从事镇江地方历史文化研究;庞艳霞(1979—),女,中学二级教师,主要从事高中语文教学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-23