[1]姜意丰.“洞穴奇案”的法理思考[J].镇江高专学报,2019,32(02):55-58.
 JIANG Yifeng.Jurisprudential thoughts on “The Strange Case of Caves”[J].,2019,32(02):55-58.
点击复制

“洞穴奇案”的法理思考()
分享到:

《镇江高专学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
32
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
55-58
栏目:
政治与法律论坛
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Jurisprudential thoughts on “The Strange Case of Caves”
文章编号:
1008-8148(2019)02-0055-04
作者:
姜意丰
华东政法大学 法律学院,上海200063
Author(s):
JIANG Yifeng
School of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200063, China
关键词:
“恶法问题”法律与道德生命价值
Keywords:
evil law issue law and morality value of life
分类号:
D910.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
彼得·萨伯在所著的《洞穴奇案》一书中,讲述了14位法官在面对同一个案件时,由于秉持不同的法哲思想,给出了14份迥然不同的判决书。其中6份有罪判决、6份无罪判决,还有2名法官拒绝裁判,最高法院最终没有形成真正的判决意见,维持了原判。对“洞穴奇案”中各方争议焦点进行法理视域下的分析,认为应作出有罪判决。
Abstract:
Peter Saber, in his book The Strange Case of Caves, tells about fourteen judges who, in the face of the same case, have given fourteen different judgments because of their different philosophical ideas. Six of them were convicted, six were acquitted, and two judges refused to adjudicate. In the end, the Supreme Court did not form a real judgment opinion and maintained the original judgment. This paper makes a jurisprudential analysis of the controversial focus of all parties in the “Strange Case of Caves” and holds that a guilty verdict should be made.

参考文献/References:

\[1\] FULLER L. The case of the speluncean explores[J]. The Harvard Law Review,1949(62):616-645. \[2\] 萨伯.洞穴奇案\[M\].陈福勇,张世泰,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2009. \[3\] 余定宇.法律启迪智慧1:地中海沿岸国家卷\[M\].北京:法律出版社,2012. \[4\] 张武举,牛克乾.在“绝境”中思考\[J\].法律适用,2013(5):116-120. \[5\] 黎宏.紧急避险法律性质研究\[J\].清华法学,2007(1):37-54. \[6\] 张王.大地震中的生命奇迹\[J\].金融经济,2008(6):68. \[7\] 托马斯·卡斯卡特.电车难题\[M\].朱沉之,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-02-21 作者简介: 姜意丰(1994—),女,江西上饶人,硕士生,主要从事法理学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-27