[1]何天.我国民事诉讼释明权运行现状及其完善[J].镇江高专学报,2019,32(01):67-70.
 HE Tian.Operation and perfection of the right of interpretation in civil procedure in China[J].,2019,32(01):67-70.
点击复制

我国民事诉讼释明权运行现状及其完善(/HTML)
分享到:

《镇江高专学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
32
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
67-70
栏目:
政治与法律论坛
出版日期:
2019-01-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
Operation and perfection of the right of interpretation in civil procedure in China
文章编号:
1008-8148(2019)01-0067-04
作者:
何天
河南财经政法大学 刑事司法学院,河南 郑州450046
Author(s):
HE Tian
School of Criminal Justice, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China
关键词:
释明权司法正义适度原则中立原则
Keywords:
Key words: interpretation right judicial justice moderate principle neutral principle
分类号:
D925.18
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在借鉴域外国家关于法官释明权规定的合理之处的基础上,从明确释明权的行使主体、适用原则、范围、方式、阶段,以及法官不当释明的法律责任、对不当行使释明权的救济途径等方面完善法官释明制度,真正发挥释明权应有的价值。
Abstract:
Abstract: On the basis of drawing lessons from the legitimacy of foreign countries regulations on the right of interpretation of judges, the system of interpretation of judges should be perfected from the aspects of clear exercising subject, applicable principle, scope, mode, stage, legal responsibility of improper interpretation of judges and remedies for improper exercising of the right of interpretation, so as to give full play to the value of the right of interpretation.

参考文献/References:

\[1\] 肖建华,陈琳.法官释明权之理论阐释与立法完善\[J\].北方法学,2007(2):74-83.

\[2\] 白春魁.法院行使法官释明中存在的问题与对策\[N\].人民法院报, 2003-08-12(6).

\[3\] 兼子一,竹下守夫.民事诉讼法\[M\] .白绿铉,译.北京:法律出版社, 1995.

\[4\] 张卫平.民事诉讼:关键词展开\[M\] .北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2005.

\[5\] 奥特马·尧厄尼希.民事诉讼法\[M\].周翠,译.北京:法律出版社,2003.

\[6\] 章武生.司法现代化与民事诉讼制度的构建\[M\].北京:法律出版社,2000.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期: 2018-10-16

作者简介: 何天(1994—),女,河南信阳人,硕士生,主要从事民事诉讼法研究。

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-19